Doctors in court, honour, and professional ethics: Two scandals in imperial Germany

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Comparing two public medical affairs which involved disciplinary proceedings and libel actions, one from Bavaria and one from Prussia, this article analyzes the dynamics behind legal conflicts over doctors' professional ethics in Imperial Germany. In both the case of Dr Maurice Hutzler, who com mitted suicide after conflicts with senior colleagues at the Gisela Children's Hospital and a sentence of the court of honour of the Munich Medical District Society, and the Berlin "patient trade" affair, in which the medical professors Ernst von Leyden, Hermann Senator, Karl Anton Ewald and Carl Posner were accused of having made payments to middlemen for bringing them lucrative private patients, notions of personal and professional honour played a central role. The Munich case highlighted shortcomings of the Bavarian medical court of honour system, which was less developed than its Prussian counterpart. The analysis of the two cases suggests that the ethics of medical practice in early twentieth-century Germany should be viewed as part of a culture of honour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maehle, A. H. (2011). Doctors in court, honour, and professional ethics: Two scandals in imperial Germany. Gesnerus - Swiss Journal of the History of Medicine and Sciences, 68(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1163/22977953-06801004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free