Culturing periprosthetic tissue in BacT/Alert® Virtuo blood culture system leads to improved and faster detection of prosthetic joint infections

27Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Blood culture bottles (BCBs) provide a semiautomated method for culturing periprosthetic tissue specimens. A study evaluating BCBs for culturing clinical samples other than body fluids is needed before implementation into clinical practice. Our objective was to evaluate use of the BacT/Alert® Virtuo blood culture system for culturing periprosthetic tissue specimens. Methods: The study was performed through the analysis of spiked (n = 36) and clinical (n = 158) periprosthetic tissue samples. Clinical samples were analyzed by the BCB method and the results were compared to the conventional microbiological culture-based method for time to detection and microorganisms identified. Results: The BacT/Alert® Virtuo blood culture system detected relevant bacteria for prosthetic joint infection in both spiked and clinical samples. The BCB method was found to be as sensitive (79%) as the conventional method (76%) (p = 0.844) during the analyses of clinical samples. The BCB method yielded positive results much faster than the conventional method: 89% against 27% detection within 24 h, respectively. The median detection time was 11.1 h for the BCB method (12 h and 11 h for the aerobic and the anaerobic BCBs, correspondingly). Conclusion: We recommend using the BacT/Alert® Virtuo blood culture system for analyzing prosthetic joint tissue, since this detect efficiently and more rapidly a wider range of bacteria than the conventional microbiological method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanabria, A., Røkeberg, M. E. O., Johannessen, M., Sollid, J. E., Simonsen, G. S., & Hanssen, A. M. (2019). Culturing periprosthetic tissue in BacT/Alert® Virtuo blood culture system leads to improved and faster detection of prosthetic joint infections. BMC Infectious Diseases, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4206-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free