Determinants of continuous use intention of smart healthcare services: Evidence from a commitment-trust theory perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: While smart healthcare services have shown potential in improving healthcare efficiency and effectiveness, significant barriers remain for consumers’ long-term engagement in such services. The study sought to propose and validate a theoretical framework to investigate the continuous use of smart healthcare services. Methods: The research model integrates commitment-trust theory with the information system success model, empirically validated through partial least squares structural equation modeling. Data were collected via a Chinese online survey platform, targeting 355 active users of smart health services. Results: The proposed model explained 61.4% of the variance in continuous usage intention. Affective commitment, trust, and satisfaction significantly affected continuous usage intention (p’s < 0.01). Trust and satisfaction were found to significantly influence affective commitment (p’s < 0.001). Satisfaction and perceived value were found to be significant determinants of trust (p’s < 0.05). Perceived value also significantly influenced satisfaction (p < 0.001). The relationships were also moderated by age, gender, and AI literacy. Conclusion: This study represents rare attempts to explore continuous usage intention of smart healthcare services from the commitment-trust theory perspective. Practitioners should prioritize trust-building measures (e.g., transparent data usage policies) and personalized features (e.g., adaptive health recommendations) to enhance long-term engagement. Demographic characteristics should also be considered when designing such services.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, K., Li, Q., & Tao, D. (2025). Determinants of continuous use intention of smart healthcare services: Evidence from a commitment-trust theory perspective. Health Informatics Journal, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251381156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free