Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Low-Voltage (Cut) Versus High-Voltage (Coag) Waveforms during Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation with the Rollerball: A Pilot Study

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Study Objective: To compare efficacy of rollerball endometrial ablation with low-voltage (cut) versus high-voltage (coag) waveforms. Design: Pilot comparative clinical study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-1). Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients: Fifty premenopausal women with menorrhagia. Intervention: Women with menorrhagia were allocated randomly to thermal destruction of the endometrium by a 5-mm rollerball with unmodulated cutting current or modulated coagulating current. Complication rate, clinical outcomes, and need for reintervention were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: At 2 years of follow-up, the reintervention rate was 26.3% in the cutting waveform group versus 31.4% in the coagulating waveform group. This difference was not statistically significant. Hysterectomy was performed in 3 (14%) women in the cutting waveform group and 5 (20%) women in the coagulating waveform group. There were no complications in either group. Conclusion: Both cutting and coagulating waveforms are equally effective for hysteroscopic endometrial ablation with the rollerball. © 2009 AAGL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, P. T., Vilos, G. A., Abu-Rafea, B., Hollett-Caines, J., Abyaneh, Z. N., & Edris, F. (2009). Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Low-Voltage (Cut) Versus High-Voltage (Coag) Waveforms during Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation with the Rollerball: A Pilot Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 16(3), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free