Tricuspid valve replacement after cardiac transplantation

10Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) occurs commonly in transplanted hearts. Although theoretically attractive, tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) has not been widely investigated as a possible therapy in post-transplant patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of TVR in heart transplant patients and its effects on measurable clinical endpoints. Methods: We acquired data by both retrospective chart review and prospective data collection in all patients who underwent TVR after cardiac transplantation. Results: Nine patients were identified and followed for a period of six months. The age of patients at time of TVR was 62 ± 6.1 yr and their average time since transplantation was 12 ± 3.2 yr. Most patients demonstrated a reduction in their furosemide dose (105 ± 63 mg/d pre-TVR vs. 67.5 ± 65 mg/d post-TVR, p = 0.001) with a reduction in serum creatinine levels (188 ± 72 μmol/L pre-TVR vs. 143 ± 42 μmol/L post-TVR, p = 0.06). Additionally, we found a significant improvement in albumin values (32 ± 5 g/L pre-TVR vs. 42 ± 3 g/L post-TVR, p = 0.002) as well as an improvement in total bilirubin (35 ± 18 μmol/L pre-TVR vs. 18 ± 5 μmol/L post-TVR, p = 0.05). There was only one death in our series, in the only patient with known severe graft atherosclerosis. Conclusions: TVR appears to be a safe procedure in patients without severe graft atherosclerosis with improvements in serum creatinine, albumin and total bilirubin values, in addition to a reduction in furosemide dose. This may reflect improved forward flow, improved symptomatology from TR as well as possible beneficial effects on nutritional status. © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raghavan, R., Cecere, R., Cantarovich, M., & Giannetti, N. (2006). Tricuspid valve replacement after cardiac transplantation. Clinical Transplantation, 20(6), 673–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00533.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free