Combined lipid goal attainment in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: A head-to-head comparative trial of statins

7Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This study compared the efficacy of two statin treatments (simvastatin vs rosuvastatin) in achieving the combined goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <2.6 mmol/L and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) <3.4 mmol/L in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Methods: After a 5-week run-in, 89 patients with type 2 diabetes having fasting triglyceride (TG) levels of 1.7 to 5.7 mmol/L or non-HDL-C levels of 3.4 to 5.2 mmol/L were randomized to receive simvastatin 20 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 40 mg for 8 weeks or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 4 weeks followed by 20 mg for 8 weeks. The primary end-point was the percentage of patients achieving the combined goal at week 12. Results: Although significant between-group differences were observed in changes in LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels, both study treatments were sufficiently intensive for a 40% to 55% LDL-C reduction. At the end of the study, the two groups had similar percentages of patients who achieved the combined lipid goal (84% vs 89%, p = 0.66). All patients who attained the combined lipid goal also met the apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) target of <0.9 g/L. No between-group differences were noted in changes in HDL-C and TG levels at week 12. The patients tolerated both treatments well. Conclusion: In our study, ≈85% of patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia could achieve the combined lipid goal with statin monotherapy. The two statin treatments could sufficiently control diabetic dyslipidemia (NCT00506961).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, T. H., Lee, I. T., Ho, L. T., Sheu, W. H. H., & Hwu, C. M. (2022). Combined lipid goal attainment in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: A head-to-head comparative trial of statins. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 85(8), 831–838. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000765

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free