Accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The goals of this meta-analysis were to assess the effectiveness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in patients with prostate carcinoma (PCa) and to explore the risk profiles with the highest benefit. Systematic electronic searched were conducted in database. We used patient-based and biopsybased pooled weighted estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for assessing the diagnostic performance of DCE. We performed direct and indirect comparisons of DCE and other methods of imaging. A total of 26 articles met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. DCE-MRI pooled sensitivity was 0.53 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.67), with a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92) on whole gland. The peripheral zone pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.86), with a specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.94). Compared with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), DCE was statistically superior to T2. In conclusion, DCE had relatively high specificity in detecting PCa but relatively low sensitivity as a complementary functional method. DCE-MRI might help clinicians exclude cases of normal tissue and serve as an adjunct to conventional imaging when seeking to identify tumor foci in patients with PCa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Z., Zheng, Y., Ji, G., Liu, X., Li, P., Cai, L., … Yang, J. (2017). Accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget, 8(44), 77975–77989. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20316

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free