Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: Stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment

38Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Elevated intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy may promote systemic inflammatory response. In patients with generalized peritonitis from perforated appendicitis, we sought to compare acute phase response and immunologic status from laparoscopic and open approach. One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients underwent appendectomy for perforated appendicitis (73 patients had laparoscopic appendectomy and 74 patients had open appendectomy. Bacteremia, endotoxemia, white blood cells, peripheral lymphocytes subpopulation, human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR), neutrophil-elastase, interleukin-1 and 6 (IL-1 and 6), and C-reactive protein were investigated. One hour after intervention, bacteremia was significantly higher in the open group compared with the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). A significantly higher concentration of systemic endotoxin was detected intraoperatively in the open group of patients in comparison with the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). Laparotomy caused a significant increase in neutrophil concentration, neutrophil-elastase, IL-1 and 6, and C-reactive protein and a decrease of HLA-DR. We recorded 6 cases (8.1%) of intra-abdominal abscess in the open group and one (1.3%) in the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). Open appendectomy, in case of peritonitis, increased the incidence of bacteremia, endotoxemia, and systemic inflammation compared with laparoscopic appendectomy. Early enhanced postoperative systemic inflammation may cause lower transient immunologic defense after laparotomy (decrease of HLA-DR), leading to enhanced sepsis in these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schietroma, M., Piccione, F., Carlei, F., Clementi, M., Bianchi, Z., De Vita, F., & Amicucci, G. (2012). Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: Stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment. American Surgeon, 78(5), 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481207800541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free