How We Refute Claims: Automatic Fact-Checking through Flaw Identification and Explanation

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Automated fact-checking is a crucial task in the governance of internet content. Although various studies utilize advanced models to tackle this issue, a significant gap persists in addressing complex real-world rumors and deceptive claims. To address this challenge, this paper explores the novel task of flaw-oriented fact-checking, including aspect generation and flaw identification. We also introduce RefuteClaim, a new framework designed specifically for this task. Given the absence of an existing dataset, we present FlawCheck, a dataset created by extracting and transforming insights from expert reviews into relevant aspects and identified flaws. The experimental results underscore the efficacy of RefuteClaim, particularly in classifying and elucidating false claims.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kao, W. Y., & Yen, A. Z. (2024). How We Refute Claims: Automatic Fact-Checking through Flaw Identification and Explanation. In WWW 2024 Companion - Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference (pp. 758–761). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651521

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free