Abstract
We sometimes make decisions relying not necessarily on deliberative thoughts but on intuitive and emotional processes in uncertain situations. The somatic marker hypothesis proposed by Damasio argued that interoception, which means bodily responses such as sympathetic activity, can be represented in the insula and anterior cingulate cortex and can play critical roles in decision-making. Though this hypothesis has been criticized in its theoretical and empirical aspects, recent studies are expanding the hypothesis to elucidate multiple bodily responses including autonomic, endocrine, and immune activities that affect decision-making. In addition, cumulative findings suggest that the anterior insula where the inner model of interoception is represented can act as an interface between the brain and body in decision-making. This article aims to survey recent findings on the brain-body interplays underlying decision-making, and to propose hypotheses on the significance of the body in decision-making.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ohira, H. (2015, February 1). Interoception and decision-making. Japanese Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.89.0_93
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.