Education for a “Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice

155Citations
Citations of this article
247Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the so-called “post-truth” world, there exists widespread confusion and disagreement over what is known, how to know, and who to trust. Current education has largely failed to meet the challenges of this world. Grounded in a new analysis of the goals of epistemic education, we argue for new directions in instruction. Our analysis specifies three components of epistemic cognition that education should address: epistemic aims, ideals, and reliable processes. Apt epistemic performance of these components has five interwoven aspects: cognitive engagement in epistemic performance, adapting performance to diverse contexts, metacognitive regulation and understanding of performance, caring and enjoyment, and participation in performance with others. Using this framework, we show how three emblematic “post-truth” problems stem from specific breakdowns in these five aspects. We then use this analysis to argue for new directions in curriculum, instruction, and research that are needed to promote successful epistemic performance in the “post-truth” landscape.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2021, January 1). Education for a “Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice. Educational Researcher. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940683

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free