Double standards of generative AI chatbots: Unveiling (digital) ageism versus sexism through sociological interviews

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The article addresses the age-based biases embedded in artificial intelligence systems (AI ageism) from a sociotechnical perspective. Building on studies about digital ageism and research on the sociocultural imprint of generative AI, we interviewed five popular generative AI chatbots as communicative partners to expose and question potential ageist and sexist stereotypes (namely, those surrounding digital users) embedded in/reproduced by these systems, using sexism as a touchstone for comparison with ageism. Results show that the chatbots follow two double standards. The first concerns the “political correctness” to which they might have been socialized: the chatbots avoid (digital) sexism but not (digital) ageism, probably because of different levels of cultural sensitivity among designers, trainers, and users, or as a reproduction of biased training data. The second concerns the chatbots’ utilities: these are differently connoted depending on the AI users’ age and gender, demonstrating the interference of ageist and sexist stereotypes with how generative AI systems organize and reproduce information about human sociality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belotti, F., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Bozan, V., Comunello, F., & Mulargia, S. (2026). Double standards of generative AI chatbots: Unveiling (digital) ageism versus sexism through sociological interviews. Big Data and Society, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261419407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free