Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE), a checklist of research-based quality indicators for nutrition education programs. Design: A prospective test of criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of a new tool comparing expert assessments and trained reviewer GENIE scores of the same nutrition education proposals. Participants: Ten nutrition education experts; 13 volunteer reviewers. Variables Measured: GENIE's face, content, and criterion validity and inter-rater reliability compared using expert assessments and reviewer objective and subjective scores. Analysis: Reviewer scores compared using Spearman correlation. Inter-rater reliability tested using intra-class correlation (ICC), Cronbach alpha, and ANOVA. Criterion validity tested using independent t test and point bi-serial correlation to compare reviewer with expert scores. Results: Correlation found between total objective and total subjective scores. Agreement found between reviewers across proposals and categories considering subjective scores (F = 7.21, P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hand, R. K., Abram, J. K., Brown, K., Ziegler, P. J., Parrott, J. S., & Steiber, A. L. (2015). Development and Validation of the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE): A Tool for Assessing the Quality of Proposed Nutrition Education Programs. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(4), 308-316.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2015.03.003
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.