Understanding NHS policy making in England: The formulation of the NHS plan, 2000

11Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Through a case study of the formulation of the English NHS Plan 2000, this article investigates which of two competing models of the British policy process-the Differentiated Polity and Asymmetric Power Models-better describes the reality of major NHS reform policy making under New Labour. The process of developing the Plan showed signs of a more open policy process, seemingly closer to the DPM. There was contestability of policy advice and limited involvement of the medical profession through its representative bodies. However, the process was tightly controlled and personally led by the Secretary of State and his advisers, with the direct involvement of the Prime Minister throughout. Two key moments of interest group involvement-the Modernisation Action Teams and the signing of the Plan by health sector organisations-were marked by power asymmetries. Overall, the APM better describes the reality of major reform policy making under New Labour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvarez-Rosete, A., & Mays, N. (2014). Understanding NHS policy making in England: The formulation of the NHS plan, 2000. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(4), 624–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free