Antibacterial effectiveness of peracetic acid and conventional endodontic irrigants

12Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study evaluated the in vitro antibacterial activity of conventional and experimental endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis. The following substances were evaluated by direct contact test: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); 2% chlorhexidine (CHX); 1% peracetic acid. After different contact periods (30 s, 1, 3, and 10 min), a neutralizing agent was applied. Serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared and plated onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) and the number of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) was determined. Sterile saline was used as a negative control. Both 2.5% NaOCl and 2% CHX eliminated E. faecalis after 30 s of contact. Peracetic acid reduced the bacterial counts by 86% after 3 min and completely eliminated E. faecalis after 10 min. These results allow us to conclude that 1% peracetic acid is effective against E. faecalis, despite its slower action compared with 2.5% NaOCl and 2% CHX.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guerreiro-Tanomaru, J. M., Morgental, R. D., Faria-Junior, N. B., Berbert, F. L. C. V., & Tanomaru-Filho, M. (2011). Antibacterial effectiveness of peracetic acid and conventional endodontic irrigants. Brazilian Dental Journal, 22(4), 285–287. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000400004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free