Clinical response to neurofeedback in major depression relates to subtypes of whole-brain activation patterns during training

Abstract

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) poses a significant public health challenge due to its high prevalence and the substantial burden it places on individuals and healthcare systems. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-NF) shows promise as a treatment for this disorder, although its mechanisms of action remain unclear. This study investigated whole-brain response patterns during rtfMRI-NF training to explain interindividual variability in clinical efficacy in MDD. We analyzed data from 95 participants (67 active, 28 control) with MDD from previous rtfMRI-NF studies designed to increase left amygdala activation through positive autobiographical memory recall. Significant symptom reduction was observed in the active group (t = −4.404, d = −0.704, p < 0.001) but not in the control group (t = −1.609, d = −0.430, p = 0.111). However, left amygdala activation did not account for the variability in clinical efficacy. To elucidate the brain training process underlying the clinical effect, we examined whole-brain activation patterns during two critical phases of the neurofeedback procedure: activation during the self-regulation period, and transient responses to feedback signal presentations. Using a systematic process involving feature selection, manifold extraction, and clustering with cross-validation, we identified two subtypes of regulation activation and three subtypes of brain responses to feedback signals. These subtypes were significantly associated with the clinical effect (regulation subtype: F = 8.735, p = 0.005; feedback response subtype: F = 5.326, p = 0.008; subtypes’ interaction: F = 3.471, p = 0.039). Subtypes associated with significant symptom reduction were characterized by selective increases in control regions, including lateral prefrontal areas, and decreases in regions associated with self-referential thinking, such as default mode areas. These findings suggest that large-scale brain activity during training is more critical for clinical efficacy than the level of activation in the neurofeedback target region itself. Tailoring neurofeedback training to incorporate these patterns could significantly enhance its therapeutic efficacy.