When acyclicity is not enough: Limitations of the causal graph

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Causal graphs are widely used in planning to capture the internal structure of planning instances. In the past, causal graphs have been exploited to generate hierarchical plans, to compute heuristics, and to identify classes of planning instances that are easy to solve. It is generally believed that planning is easier when the causal graph is acyclic. In this paper we show that this is not true in the worst case, proving that the problem of plan existence is PSPACE-complete even when the causal graph is acyclic. Since the variables of the planning instances in our reduction are propositional, this result applies to STRIPS planning with negative pre-conditions. Having established that planning is hard for acyclic causal graphs, we study a subclass of planning instances with acyclic causal graphs whose variables have strongly connected domain transition graphs. For this class, we show that plan existence is easy, but that bounded plan existence is hard, implying that optimal planning is significantly harder than satisficing planning for this class. Copyright © 2013, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jonsson, A., Jonsson, P., & Lööw, T. (2013). When acyclicity is not enough: Limitations of the causal graph. In ICAPS 2013 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (pp. 117–125). https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v23i1.13550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free