Abstract
Introduction and Aims: The determination of energy needs is essential for the nutritional support of acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. The assessment of energy needs can be measured by indirect calorimetry (IC) or estimated by using prediction equations. The precision of these formulas in critically ill patients is unclear, especially in AKI patients. Objective: To evaluate the resting energy expenditure (REE) of AKI patients measured by IC and compare it with the results provided by four different prediction equations. Methods: Patients admitted to the Clinical Hospital of Botucatu School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil, from September 2012 to November 2013 were evaluated. AKI patients with suggestive clinical of acute tubular necrosis were included. The REE of the patients was obtained by IC and estimated by prediction equations of Harris ‐Benedict x 1.25 , Faisy , Mifflin ‐St Jeor and Penn ‐State. Precision of the formulas was defined as prediction values that fell within 90% to 110% of the measured REE by IC. The results of clinical and nutritional characteristics of the patients were described by median or mean and standard deviation. It was adopted as statistically significant p < 0.05. This study received financial support from the Fundac¸ão De Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado De São Paulo (FAPESP). Results: Eighty patients were included, with mean age 63.7 ± 15.8 years , male prevalence (68.7% ) and 95 % of ICU stay. AKI associated with sepsis was the most prevalent etiology (88.8% ). ATN ‐ ISS was 0.65 ± 0.18 , need for dialysis 81% and mortality rate of 75 % . Body mass index was 28.49 ± 7.20 kg/m2 and the REE measured by IC was 2033 (1548.5 to 2414.65 kcal / day). Results for equations Harris Benedict x 1.25, Mifflin , Penn ‐State and Faisy were 1832 (1570.15 to 2094.63 kcal/day) , 1451.87 ( 1229.25 to 1609.75 ) kcal/day, 1937.2 ( 1768, 54‐2136.05 ) kcal/day and 1740.6 ( 1521.50 to 1984.2 ) kcal/day, respectively. The precision of the equations Harris Benedict x 1.25, Mifflin , Penn ‐State and Faisy was 27.5%, 25%, 21.25% and 6.25%, respectevely. Conclusions: AKI patients presented REE measured by IC of 2033 (1548.5 to 2414.65 kcal / day), higher than that estimated by the prediction equations of Harris Benedict , Mifflin , Penn ‐State and Faisy. All formulas underestimated REE and showed low precision in predicting the REE in AKI.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Goes, C., Ponce, D., Soncini, A. C., Buffarah, M. N., & Balbi, A. (2015). SP197COMPARISON OF INDIRECT CALORIMETRY AND PREDICTION EQUATIONS IN ESTIMATING THE RESTING ENERGY EXPENDITURE IN CRITICALLY ILL ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY PATIENTS. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 30(suppl_3), iii442–iii443. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfv190.09
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.