Proton pump inhibitors increase significantly the risk of Clostridium difficile infection in a low-endemicity, non-outbreak hospital setting

82Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background : Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been linked to higher risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The relevance of this association in hospitals with low disease activity, where an outbreak strain is nondominant, has been assessed in relatively few studies. Aim : To assess the association of PPI and CDI in a setting of low disease activity. Methods : A retrospective cohort study was conducted at two hospitals. Patients admitted for ≥7 days receiving antibiotics were included. Demographics, exposure to PPI, antibiotics and other drugs in relation to diagnosis of CDI were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results : Of 14 719 patients, 149 (1%) first episode CDI were documented; PPI co-exposure increased CDI [1.44 cases/100 patients vs. 0.74 cases/100 non-exposed (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.42-2.72)]. By logistic regression, PPI days (adjusted OR: 1.01 per day, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02), histamine-2 blockers, antidepressants, antibiotic days, exposure to medications, age, admission service and length of admission were significant predictors. Conclusions : A statistically significant increase in CDI was observed in antibiotic recipients who received PPI, but the absolute risk increase is modest. In settings of with low rates of CDI, the benefit of PPI therapy outweighs the risk of developing CDI. These data support programmes to decrease inappropriate use of PPI in hospitalized patients. © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dalton, B. R., Lye-Maccannell, T., Henderson, E. A., MacCannell, D. R., & Louie, T. J. (2009). Proton pump inhibitors increase significantly the risk of Clostridium difficile infection in a low-endemicity, non-outbreak hospital setting. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 29(6), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03924.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free