A Post-American Middle East? US Realities Vs. Chinese and Russian Alternatives

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

For the past 15 years, there have been increasing calls for the United States to reduce its overseas force structure and to bring troops home. Such discussion accelerated during the Trump administration, and perceptions of American retrenchment were heightened by President Joe Biden's decision to withdraw from Afghanistan. This article asks the key question: Is Washington really engaging in a systematic pullout from the Middle East? Based on publicly available evidence, I argue that, contrary to common perceptions, the American military is actually increasing its forward presence in the Arabian Peninsula and Gulf region. In addition, I contend that the two other states that have the potential to replace the United States in the Middle East, Russia and China, are for multiple reasons incapable of doing so. In addition to puncturing the myths, the article contributes to the ongoing policy debates and theoretical literatures regarding Middle East security and great-power competition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Colley, C. K. (2023). A Post-American Middle East? US Realities Vs. Chinese and Russian Alternatives. Middle East Policy, 30(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12670

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free