Uncertainty in flood damage estimates and its potential effect on investment decisions

106Citations
Citations of this article
186Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper addresses the large differences that are found between damage estimates of different flood damage models. It explains how implicit assumptions in flood damage functions and maximum damages can have large effects on flood damage estimates. This explanation is then used to quantify the uncertainty in the damage estimates with a Monte Carlo analysis. The Monte Carlo analysis uses a damage function library with 272 functions from seven different flood damage models. The paper shows that the resulting uncertainties in estimated damages are in the order of magnitude of a factor of 2 to 5. The uncertainty is typically larger for flood events with small water depths and for smaller flood events. The implications of the uncertainty in damage estimates for flood risk management are illustrated by a case study in which the economic optimal investment strategy for a dike segment in the Netherlands is determined. The case study shows that the uncertainty in flood damage estimates can lead to significant over- or under-investments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagenaar, D. J., De Bruijn, K. M., Bouwer, L. M., & De Moel, H. (2016). Uncertainty in flood damage estimates and its potential effect on investment decisions. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1-2016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free