Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Real-world data from the Cancer Medicines Outcomes Programme (CMOP)

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To report the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, we conducted a retrospective study of 126 patients. Methods: The electronic chemotherapy prescribing system was used to identify patients from the West of Scotland Cancer Network who received NACT over a 5 year period. Baseline characteristic and treatments details were collected. Association of treatment type and other variables with overall survival (OS) were analysed using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The median follow up was 30 months. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 34–54), 86% had squamous pathology and 93% had at least International Federation of Gynaecology & Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II disease at diagnosis. 27% had stage IV disease and 30% had para-aortic nodal involvement. NACT regimens consisted primarily of 3 weekly cisplatin/paclitaxel (63%) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (35%). 86% of patients subsequently received chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), 11% radical radiotherapy alone and the remaining patients progressed or defaulted. Three year OS was 61.8% (95% CI (Confidence Interval) 53.4–71.6). Survival was poorer in patients with neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥5 (hazard ratio 2.8 (95% CI 1.32–5.90)) and in those not receiving CCRT (hazard ratio 2.23 (95% CI 1.01–4.91)). Conclusions: Three year OS was reasonable considering the advanced nature of the cohort and suggests that NACT is an option for women with bulky cervical cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baillie, K., Reed, N., Laskey, J., Pan, J., Kavanagh, K., Bennie, M., … Graham, K. (2021). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Real-world data from the Cancer Medicines Outcomes Programme (CMOP). European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 42(5), 926–935. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ejgo4205140

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free