Political geography III: Authoritarian geographies

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The third progress report on political geography focuses on authoritarian geographies around the world. Although most studies analyze the practice of authoritarianism in a particular country, several themes are evident across these distinct local contexts: a sense of grievance, a perception that a chosen group has been replaced or threatened, a certainty that an outside group is to blame, and a desire to act, at almost any cost, to restore the chosen group to its previous status. The report also considers the authoritarian fascination with digital spaces, cryptocurrencies, infrastructure, and nature. The review identifies the expansion of authoritarian politics while highlighting a growing body of scholarship examining its implications at the local, national, regional, and global scales.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, R. (2026). Political geography III: Authoritarian geographies. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325261446609

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free