Bureaucratic politicization, partisan attachments, and the limits of public agency legitimacy: The Venezuelan armed forces under chavismo

12Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Which factors determine support for the armed forces? What is the effect of agency politicization on confidence? Existing studies, which draw largely from bureaucratically neutral militaries, find that interpersonal trust and demographic variables play significant roles in determining public confidence in the armed forces. I argue that this is different for a politicized agency. A loss of bureaucratic neutrality activates voters’ partisan attachments, inducing individuals to judge the agency on the basis of their ties to the governing party or leader. Using survey data from Venezuela, I show that government evaluation has a salient and bifurcated effect on respondents’ perceptions of their armed forces. Respondents sympathetic to the governing leader are more likely to have a favorable view of the military while those identifying as opposition are more likely to have a negative view. The results suggest that politicization of public agencies may impose an upper limit on public support regardless of institutional performance, undermine their representativeness and legitimacy, and weaken their mandates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2019). Bureaucratic politicization, partisan attachments, and the limits of public agency legitimacy: The Venezuelan armed forces under chavismo. Latin American Research Review, 54(2), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free