Arthroscopic Treatment of Patellar and Trochlear Cartilage Lesions with Matrix Encapsulated Chondrocyte Implantation versus Microfracture: Quantitative Assessment with MRI T2-Mapping and MOCART at 4-Year Follow-up

Abstract

Methods: Seventeen patients aged 18 to 55 years with symptomatic full-thickness cartilage lesions on either patella or trochlea were treated with matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) or microfracture (MF). Both procedures combined with unloading/realigning techniques. Clinical assessment and T2-mapping were evaluated at 48-months. Results: Clinically results from pre-op to 48-months improved significantly in MACI and MF for Lysholm (p = 0.001, p = 0.001), IKDC-S (p = 0.001, p = 0.002), KOOS-P (p = 0.000, p = 0.002), KOOS-DLA (p = 0.002, p = 0.003), KOOS-Sports/Rec (p = 0.000, p = 0.004), KOOS-QoL (p = 0.000, p = 0.003), KOOS-symptoms (p = 0.001, p = 0.020), and Kujala (p = 0.000, p = 0.01), respectively. Tegner was significant between baseline and 48 months only for MACI (p < 0.008) compared with MF (p = 0.25). No significant difference was observed between groups for any score at 3, 12, 24, and 48-months (p > 0.05). T2-mapping values improved significantly over time in MACI compared with MF at 24 months (39.35 vs. 50.44, p = 0.007) and 48 months (36.54 vs. 48.37, p = 0.005). When comparing control values to MACI at 12-m (p = 0.714), 24-m (p = 0.175), and 48-m (p = 0.097), no significant difference was found. MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score comparison gave no statistical difference between groups. Conclusions: Clinically both techniques improved significantly over time. However, quantitative assessment showed that only newly formed tissue with MACI technique improves significantly since 12-months and maintains stable values compared with native cartilage until 48-month follow-up. MF results were never comparable to those native values. Level of evidence II.