The Prognostic Value of Anemia in Patients with Preserved, Mildly Reduced and Recovered Ejection Fraction

10Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

40% by subgroup—preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and the newly defined recovered EF (HFrecEF)—are scarce. Patients with HF symptoms, elevated NT-proBNP, EF ≥ 40% and structural abnormalities were registered in the HFpEF-HFmrEF database. We described the outcome of our HFpEF-HFmrEF cohort by the presence of anemia. Additionally, HFrecEF patients were also selected from HFrEF patients who underwent resynchronization and, as responders, reached 40% EF. Using propensity score matching (PSM), 75 pairs from the HFpEF-HFmrEF and HFrecEF groups were matched by their clinical features. After PMS, we compared the survival of the HFpEF-HFmrEF and HFrecEF groups. Log-rank, uni-and multivariate regression analyses were performed. From 375 HFpEF-HFmrEF patients, 42 (11%) died during the median follow-up time of 1.4 years. Anemia (HR 2.77; 95%CI 1.47–5.23; p < 0.01) was one of the strongest mortality predictors, which was also confirmed by the multivariate analysis (aHR 2.33; 95%CI 1.21–4.52; p = 0.01). Through PSM, the outcomes for HFpEF-HFmrEF and HFrecEF patients with anemia were poor, exhibiting no significant difference. In HFpEF-HFmrEF, anemia was an independent mortality predictor. Its presence multiplied the mortality risk in those with EF ≥ 40%, regardless of HF etiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pintér, A., Behon, A., Veres, B., Merkel, E. D., Schwertner, W. R., Kuthi, L. K., … Kosztin, A. (2022). The Prognostic Value of Anemia in Patients with Preserved, Mildly Reduced and Recovered Ejection Fraction. Diagnostics, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020517

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free