MRI findings in the painful poststroke shoulder

43Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We describe the structural abnormalities in the painful shoulder of stroke survivors and their relationships to clinical characteristics. METHOD: Eighty-nine chronic stroke survivors with poststroke shoulder pain underwent T1- and T2-weighted multiplanar, multisequence MRI of the painful paretic shoulder. All scans were reviewed by one radiologist for the following abnormalities: rotator cuff, biceps and deltoid tears, tendinopathies and atrophy, subacromial bursa fluid, labral ligamentous complex abnormalities, and acromioclavicular capsular hypertrophy. Clinical variables included subject demographics, stroke characteristics, and the Brief Pain Inventory Questions 12. The relationship between MRI findings and clinical characteristics was assessed through logistic regression. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of subjects exhibited a tear of at least one rotator cuff, biceps or deltoid muscle. Fifty-three percent of subjects exhibited tendinopathy of at least one rotator cuff, bicep or deltoid muscle. The prevalence of rotator cuff tears increased with age. However, rotator cuff tears and rotator cuff and deltoid tendinopathies were not related to severity of poststroke shoulder pain. In approximately 20% of cases, rotator cuff and deltoid muscles exhibited evidence of atrophy. Atrophy was associated with reduced motor strength and reduced severity of shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff tears and rotator cuff and deltoid tendinopathies are highly prevalent in poststroke shoulder pain. However, their relationship to shoulder pain is uncertain. Atrophy is less common but is associated with less severe shoulder pain. © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, R. R., Haghpanah, S., Elovic, E. P., Flanagan, S. R., Behnegar, A., Nguyen, V., … Chae, J. (2008). MRI findings in the painful poststroke shoulder. Stroke, 39(6), 1808–1813. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502187

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free