The effect of birth weight on body composition: Evidence from a birth cohort and a Mendelian randomization study

16Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Lower birth weight is associated with diabetes although the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Muscle mass could be a modifiable link and hence a target of intervention. We assessed the associations of birth weight with muscle and fat mass observationally in a population with little socio-economic patterning of birth weight and using Mendelian randomization (MR) for validation. Methods In the population-representative "Children of 1997" birth cohort (n = 8,327), we used multivariable linear regression to assess the adjusted associations of birth weight (kg) with muscle mass (kg) and body fat (%) at ∼17.5 years. Genetically predicted birth weight (effect size) was applied to summary genetic associations with fat-free mass and fat mass (kg) from the UK Biobank (n = ∼331,000) to obtain unconfounded estimates using inverse-variance weighting. Results Observationally, birth weight was positively associated with muscle mass (3.29 kg per kg birth weight, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.83 to 3.75) and body fat (1.09% per kg birth weight, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.65). Stronger associations with muscle mass were observed in boys than in girls (p for interaction 0.004). Using MR, birth weight was positively associated with fat-free mass (0.77 kg per birth weight z-score, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.33) and fat mass (0.58, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.15). No difference by sex was evident. Conclusion Higher birth weight increasing muscle mass may be relevant to lower birth weight increasing the risk of diabetes and suggests post-natal muscle mass as a potential target of intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, J., Yeung, S. L. A., He, B., Kwok, M. K., Leung, G. M., & Schooling, C. M. (2019). The effect of birth weight on body composition: Evidence from a birth cohort and a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS ONE, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free