Cancer biomarkers: Can we turn recent failures into success?

312Citations
Citations of this article
294Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Disease biomarkers are used widely in medicine. But very few biomarkers are useful for cancer diagnosis and monitoring. Over the past 15 years, major investments have been made to discover and validate cancer biomarkers. Despite such investments, no new major cancer biomarkers have been approved for clinical use for at least 25 years. In the last decade, many reports have described new cancer biomarkers that promised to revolutionize the diagnosis of cancer and the management of cancer patients. However, many initially promising biomarkers have not been validated for clinical use. In this commentary, a plethora of parameters before sample analysis, during sample analysis, and after sample analysis that can complicate biomarker discovery and validation and lead to "false discovery" are discussed. Several examples of biomarker discoveries that were published in high-profile journals are also presented, as well as why they were not validated and the lessons learned from these false discoveries, so that similar mistakes can be avoided in the future. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diamandis, E. P. (2010, October 6). Cancer biomarkers: Can we turn recent failures into success? Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free