Loss Analysis and Concept Comparison for Electrically Driven Hydraulic Loader Crane

  • Rankka A
  • Dell’Amico A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The load-sensing system has for a long time been the most energy efficient hydraulic system widely used for mobile machines. When replacing the combustion engine drive with an electric drive with a battery as energy source an incentive for using more energy efficient systems arise. Some promising examples of more energy efficient systems are independent metering systems, pump controlled systems and open flow control systems. Before getting to deeply involved in a specific design, an investigation of the intended application is of importance. The objective of this study is to present a large number of energy efficient designs for the hydraulic system of an electrified loader crane by the means of a loss analysis and a high level concept comparison. To be able to cover a large design space all systems are modeled based on static pressure-flow relations for their components. Based on measurements, the losses from simultaneous operation, backpressure losses and load holding valve losses are found to be the largest loss contributors in the hydraulic system. If an electrical supply system is added to the reference load sensing system, the overall efficiency is found to be 23 %. The hydraulic system it is found to account for 62 % of the losses and the drive system for 38 %. The concept comparison shows that a two or four pump system with recuperation possibilities can decrease the energy consumption of the complete system on the studied working pattern by about 50 %.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rankka, A., & Dell’Amico, A. (2021). Loss Analysis and Concept Comparison for Electrically Driven Hydraulic Loader Crane. In Proceedings of the 17:th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP’21, June 1-2, 2021, Linköping, Sweden (Vol. 182, pp. 237–251). Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp182p237

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free