Regional tissue oxygen saturation: comparability and reproducibility of different devices

  • Pocivalnik M
  • Pichler G
  • Zotter H
  • et al.
56Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Comparability and reproducibility of different near-infrared spectroscopy devices measuring regional tissue oxygen saturation remain poor. Aim of the present study was to compare values and reproducibility of cerebral/peripheral "tissue-oxygenation-index" (TOI; NIRO 300, Hamamatsu ® , Japan) with cerebral/peripheral "regional-oxygen-saturation" (rSO; INVOS5100, Somanetics ® , USA), and to analyze the influence of quality criteria. Methods: cTOI and crSO2 were measured on the left forehead, pTOI and prSO2 were measured on the left calf. To analyse reproducibility, optodes were reapplied five times. A quality criterion was introduced for cTOI, crSO2 and prSO2. For pTOI quality criteria were introduced in combination with a venous occlusion technique. Results: Cerebralmeasurements were performed in 37 neonates. cTOI (72.7+/-6.2%) was lower than crSO2 (83.3+/-5.8%) (p < 0.001). The mean difference between cTOI and crSO2 was 10%. Mean standard deviations of cTOI and crSO2 were similar (cTOI: 4.9+/-3.6; crSO2: 4.5+/-2.6). Peripheral measurements were performed in 39 neonates. pTOI (66.0+/-7.9%) was lower than prSO2 (82.0+/-7.0%)(p < 0.001). The mean difference between pTOI and prSO2 was 15%. Mean standard deviations of pTOI (3.7+/-2.6%) were lower than of prSO2 (5.0+/-3.0%) (p = 0.047). Conclusion: TOI values were significantly lower than rSO2 values, in cerebral and peripheral measurements. Reproducibility was higher for pTOI than for prSO2. © 2011 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pocivalnik, M., Pichler, G., Zotter, H., Tax, N., Müller, W., & Urlesberger, B. (2011). Regional tissue oxygen saturation: comparability and reproducibility of different devices. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 16(5), 057004. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3575647

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free