A Systematic Review of Metrics Measuring Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A particular concern with SAE Level 3 automation is the takeover transition from the automated vehicle to the human driver. In response, research has focused on investigating this transition. However, researchers have used a wide range of metrics to measure takeover performance. The lack of consistency in these metrics poses challenges for synthesizing findings. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic literature review of studies published between January 2009 and December 2019, focusing on the takeover performance metrics. Following prior research, we categorize these metrics into two dimensions: timeliness and quality. Additionally, we summarize the scenarios used to elicit takeover requests and analyze the corresponding maneuvers (braking, lane changing, and lane keeping). The results have shown inconsistencies in calculation and naming conventions of takeover performance metrics. Based on these findings, this study proposes several directions for standardizing definitions and terminology, and advancing toward a unified measure of takeover performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, D. W., Chung, H., Cao, Y., Zhou, F., Molnar, L., Robert, L. P., … Yang, X. J. (2026). A Systematic Review of Metrics Measuring Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 42(8), 6331–6360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2552863

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free