Irinotecan cytotoxicity does not necessarily depend on the UGT1A1 polymorphism but on fluoropyrimidine: A molecular case report

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that the combined use of doxifluridine and irinotecan shows a different molecular mechanism than that of the protracted venous infusion of 5-FU and irinotecan. In this analysis, there is a suggestion that doxifluridine may enhance irinotecan and enable us to decrease the dose of irinotecan without losing the strong effect by using doxifluridine instead of 5-FU. We present a colon cancer patient with the UGT1A1 polymorphism (UGT1A1*28) as a known high risk for irinotecan, who was treated with a combination of doxifluridine and irinotecan for peritoneal dissemination resulting in stable disease for 2 years without adverse reactions, although the patient initially developed severe adverse effects to the combination of the protracted venous infusion of 5-FU and irinotecan. Even with the same ratios of fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan combinations, replacing 5-FU with doxifluridine or capecitabine could provide new strategies to obtain not only convenience but also better efficacy and safety at the molecular level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Inoue, Y., Miki, C., Watanabe, H., Hiro, J., Toiyama, Y., Ojima, E., … Kusunoki, M. (2006). Irinotecan cytotoxicity does not necessarily depend on the UGT1A1 polymorphism but on fluoropyrimidine: A molecular case report. Oncology Reports, 16(5), 971–974. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.16.5.971

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free