243 * QUALITY OF LIFE AS AN INTEGRAL ASPECT OF TRANSAPICAL TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION OUTCOME

  • Sterner D
  • Schiller W
  • Welz A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) has been shown to be an effective and safe alternative procedure in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. However, as elderly patients with multiple co-existing disorders are treated, quality of life (QoL) becomes a fundamental aspect of outcome. We therefore assessed not only clinical parameters such as morbidity and mortality but also focused on subjective improvement of life quality after TA-TAVI procedures. Furthermore, efficiency of TA-TAVI therapy was evaluated by comparison with surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and patients with chronic diseases in terms of these aspects. Methods: Between June 2008 to October 2011, 60 consecutive TA-TAVI patients (age 78.8 ± 6.3 years; .7% women, log EuroSCORE 22.1% ± 16.7%; Edwards Sapien XT) were included in the study. Complication rates were evaluated according to VARC criteria. Forty-four patients could be asked about life quality six months after the procedure, using the SF-36 survey to assess quality of life. Response rate was 95.7%. Norm based Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were calculated. Comparison of data of, for example, patients with chronic disease was assessed with two tailed t-test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized for survival statistics. Results: Thirty-day mortality was 5%, and overall 1-year survival rate was 78.3%; 3.4% of patients had a stroke, and 8.5% required pacemaker implantation. Results of the SF-36 demonstrated relatively low PCS (36.47 ± 10.47) and MCS (44.63 ± 11.4) scores. However, in 79.6% of patients, postoperative QoL was rated improved or at least unchanged. Compared with results of surgical AVR, quality of life after TA-TAVI was shown to be significantly lower, with values close to patients with life-limiting diseases like cancer. Conclusions: In conclusion, self-assessment by the SF-36 survey is an effective instrument with which to evaluate disease-related life quality. For evaluation of TA-TAVI efficiency, QoL should be analysed in addition to clinical parameters. Due to considerably impaired QoL PCS and MCS scores, careful psychological supervision of TA-TAVI patients has to be considered in the pre- and postoperative course.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sterner, D., Schiller, W., Welz, A., Gessner, C., Sinnig, M., Dewald, O., … Mellert, F. (2013). 243 * QUALITY OF LIFE AS AN INTEGRAL ASPECT OF TRANSAPICAL TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION OUTCOME. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 17(suppl 2), S128–S128. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt372.243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free