PARSIMONY JACKKNIFING OUTPERFORMS NEIGHBOR‐JOINING

  • Farris J
  • Albert V
  • Källersjö M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract— Because they are designed to produced just one tree, neighbor‐joining programs can obscure ambiguities in data. Ambiguities can be uncovered by resampling, but existing neighbor‐joining programs may give misleading bootstrap frequencies because they do not suppress zero‐length branches and/or are sensitive to the order of terminals in the data. A new procedure, parsimony jackknifing, overcomes these problems while running hundreds of times faster than existing programs for neighbor‐joining bootstrapping. For analysis of large matrices, parsimony jackknifing is hundreds of thousands of times faster than extensive branch‐swapping, yet is better able to screen out poorly‐supported groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farris, J. S., Albert, V. A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., & Kluge, A. G. (1996). PARSIMONY JACKKNIFING OUTPERFORMS NEIGHBOR‐JOINING. Cladistics, 12(2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00196.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free