Correlation between lymphocyte CD4 count, treatment duration, opportunistic infection and cognitive function in human immunodeficiency virus-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV-AIDS) patients

9Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is an epidemic worldwide, despite the marked benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ARV) in reducing severe HIV-associated dementia. A milder form of neurocognitive disorders are still prevalent and remain a challenge. AIM: This study aimed to determine the correlation between plasma cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) lymphocyte, duration of ARV treatment, opportunistic infections, and cognitive function in HIV-AIDS patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving 85 HIV-AIDS patients was conducted at Adam Malik General Hospital Medan, Indonesia. All subjects were subjected to physical, neurologic examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Indonesian Version (MoCA-INA) to assess cognitive function and measurement of lymphocyte CD4 counts. RESULTS: Out of the 85 subjects evaluated, the proportion concerning sexes include 52 males (61.2%) and 33 females (38.8%). The mean age was 38.53 ± 9.77 years old. There was a significant correlation between CD4 lymphocyte counts and MoCA-INA score (r = 0.271, p = 0.012), but there was no significant correlation between duration of ARV treatment and MoCA-INA score. There was also no difference in MoCA-INA score based on the presence of opportunistic infection. CONCLUSION: Lymphocyte CD4 count was independently correlated with cognitive function in HIV-AIDS patients.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fitri, F. I., Rambe, A. S., & Fitri, A. (2018). Correlation between lymphocyte CD4 count, treatment duration, opportunistic infection and cognitive function in human immunodeficiency virus-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV-AIDS) patients. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(4), 643–647. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free