Tizanidine Versus Baclofen in the Treatment of Spasticity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

89Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tizanidine (Sirdalud) was compared to baclofen (Lioresal) in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Each medication was introduced over a three week titration period and then maintained at the highest tolerated dose for five weeks. The two treatment phases were separated by a one week drug withdrawal and a two week washout period. Sixty-six patients entered the trial and forty-eight completed both treatment phases. At the end of the trial, neurologists and physiotherapists thought that baclofen was superior on the basis of perceived efficacy and tolerance (p≤0.05). Although the efficacy of tizanidine or baclofen was judged as good to excellent by 24 and 39% of patients respectively, this difference was not statistically significant. Muscle weakness was the most common adverse effect. This was significantly more troublesome in patients treated with baclofen. Somnolence and xerostomia were more common in patients treated with tizanidine. Both baclofen and tizanidine appear to be useful adjuncts in the treatment of spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Preference of either drug is tempered principally by side-effects. © 1988, Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bass, B., Weinshenker, B., Rice, G. P. A., Noseworthy, J. H., Cameron, M. G. P., Hader, W., … Ebers, G. C. (1988). Tizanidine Versus Baclofen in the Treatment of Spasticity in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques, 15(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100027104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free