Age-specific characteristics of ELISA and fecal culture for purpose-specific testing for paratuberculosis

89Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Paratuberculosis is a chronic infection, and animals are not equally affected by it. Therefore, diagnostic tests that are able to detect different stages of the infection are needed for objective decision making. A longitudinal study was carried out to describe the ability of 2 tests to predict 2 conditions in dairy cattle: "infection" and "infectious," exemplifying 2 different purposes of testing. "Infection" is the term of choice for certification and eradication purposes, and "infectious" is more relevant for control purposes. In the study period of 3 yr, repeated sampling of milk (n = 23,219) and feces (n = 8,832) was performed. A total of 1,985 Danish dairy cows provided material for the study. Milk samples were analyzed for antibodies using an ELISA, and fecal samples were analyzed for mycobacteria by culture. A reference test to correctly classify cattle antemortem does not exist; thus, "infection" and " infectious" were defined by repeated testing using one test as the condition to be detected by the other test. Fecal culture responses were evaluated against antibody status, and ELISA responses were evaluated against detected bacterial shedding. The results of this study indicate that the ability of both tests to detect "infection" increases almost linearly from 2 to 5 yr of age, whereas the ability of both tests to detect " infectious" is not affected by age. Purpose-specific tests are required to appropriately interpret and use test results for management of paratuberculosis, and relevant covariates, such as age, should be included when possible. © American Dairy Science Association, 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nielsen, S. S., & Toft, N. (2006). Age-specific characteristics of ELISA and fecal culture for purpose-specific testing for paratuberculosis. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(2), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72120-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free