Apologies as 'shame management': the politics of remorse in the aftermath of historical institutional abuse

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper examines the role of apology as a vehicle for shame management in the aftermath of historical institutional abuse (HIA). It draws on extensive fieldwork in Ireland, North and South, including: archival research on public apologies; focus groups with members of the public and with victims; and semistructured interviews with key stakeholders. It focuses on the complexities of apology in managing 'shame' and 'self-blame' for those constituencies affected by HIA - survivors, apologisers, institutions and wider society. Drawing on the notions of 'shame' and 'shame management', it proposes an interdependent model in order to better understand the function and meaning of apology in such contexts. In addressing the multi-layered relational dimensions of shame surrounding HIA, apology is presented as a potential means of invoking: (a) truth for victims; (b) accountability of offenders; (c) leadership of institutions; and (d) the re-imagination of national identity. The paper concludes by examining the additional performative aspects of shaming and the emotional expression of remorse in establishing proximity to historical wrongdoing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McAlinden, A. M. (2022). Apologies as “shame management”: the politics of remorse in the aftermath of historical institutional abuse. Legal Studies, 42(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2021.39

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free