Abstract
Australia and Canada have been active participants in international climate change negotiations since the early 1990s and have often shared negotiating positions. This paper discusses why, in spite of considerable similarities in national circumstances, the Canadian government chose to ratify the Kyoto Protocol in 2002, while the Australian government decided against doing so. It is argued that a range of factors led to a narrower conception of the national interest in the case of Australia, which encouraged a focus on the short-term, economic costs of implementing the Protocol.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Barnsley, I. (2006). Dealing with change: Australia, Canada and the Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Round Table, 95(385), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358530600748358
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.