CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES

163Citations
Citations of this article
194Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Façade geometrical details can substantially influence the near-façade airflow patterns and pressures. This is especially the case for building balconies as their presence can lead to multiple separation and recirculation areas near the façades and hence large changes in surface pressure distribution. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely used to investigate the impact of building balconies, mainly based on the steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the performance of steady RANS and large-eddy simulations (LES) in predicting the near-façade airflow patterns and mean surface pressure coefficients (Cp) for a building with balconies for three wind directions θ = 0°, 90°, 180°, where 0° is perpendicular to the façade under study. The evaluation is based on validation with wind-tunnel measurements of Cp. The results show that both RANS and LES can accurately predict Cp on the windward façade for θ = 0° with average absolute deviations of 0.113 and 0.091 from the measured data, respectively. For the other two wind directions, LES is clearly superior. For θ = 90°, the average absolute deviations for RANS and LES are 0.302 and 0.096, while these are 0.161 and 0.038 for θ = 180°. Large differences are found in the computed flow fields on the balcony spaces. Because RANS systematically underestimates the absolute values of both Cp and mean wind speed on the balconies, it is suggested that building design based on RANS might result in excessive ventilation and in too high wind nuisance level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, X., Montazeri, H., & Blocken, B. (2020). CFD simulations of wind flow and mean surface pressure for buildings with balconies: Comparison of RANS and LES. Building and Environment, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106747

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free