Spinal versus General Anaesthesia in Postoperative Pain Management during Transurethral Procedures

  • Tyritzis S
  • Stravodimos K
  • Vasileiou I
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the analgesic efficacy of spinal and general anaesthesia following transurethral procedures. 97 and 47 patients underwent transurethral bladder tumour resection (TUR-B) and transurethral prostatectomy (TUR-P), respectively. Postoperative pain was recorded using an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS score was greatest at discharge from recovery room for general anaesthesia (). The pattern changed significantly at 8 h and 12 h for general anaesthesia's efficacy ( and resp.). A higher VAS score was observed in pT2 patients. Patients with resected tumour volume >10 exhibited a VAS score >3 at 8 h and 24 h (, resp.). Multifocality of bladder tumours induced more pain overall. It seems that spinal anaesthesia is more effective during the first 2 postoperative hours, while general prevails at later stages and at larger traumatic surfaces. Finally, we incidentally found that tumour stage plays a significant role in postoperative pain, a point that requires further verification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tyritzis, S. I., Stravodimos, K. G., Vasileiou, I., Fotopoulou, G., Koritsiadis, G., Migdalis, V., … Constantinides, C. A. (2011). Spinal versus General Anaesthesia in Postoperative Pain Management during Transurethral Procedures. ISRN Urology, 2011, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/895874

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free