An Analysis of Volume, Length and Segmentation of Free Fibula Flap in Reconstruction of the Jaws: Investigation of Their Role on Flap Failure

  • Di Bartolomeo M
  • Lusetti I
  • Pinelli M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reconstruction of defects of the jaws is mainly performed via free fibula flap. An incidence of 2–21% of overall flap failure is still described. We investigated the roles of volume, length and number of fibula flap segments on flap survival using novel three-dimensional segmentation tools. We also analyzed the role of other possible risk factors. Seventy-one consecutive patients with a follow up of at least three months and who underwent free fibula flap reconstruction in a single center between 2002 and 2022 have been evaluated. A total of 166 fibula segments were analyzed. Malignancies were the main reason of resection (45.1%). In 69% of the cases a reconstruction of the mandible was performed. The flaps were mainly divided in two segments (39%) (range 1–4), with a mean length of 2.52 cm and a mean volume was 3.37 cm3. Total flap failure (TFF) occurred in 12 cases, (16.9%), while partial flap failure (PFF) appeared in 3 patients (4.2%). Volume, length and number of fibula flap segments did not seem to influence flap failure incidence in uni- and multivariate analysis. Reconstruction of the maxilla and use of a recipient vessel different from the facial artery seemed to significantly impact on flap failure. Smoking and previous surgeries showed a higher trend to flap failure, but they did not reach statistical significance. Prospective and multicentric analysis on a wider population should be assessed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Bartolomeo, M., Lusetti, I. L., Pinelli, M., Negrello, S., Pellacani, A., Angelini, S., … Anesi, A. (2023). An Analysis of Volume, Length and Segmentation of Free Fibula Flap in Reconstruction of the Jaws: Investigation of Their Role on Flap Failure. Reports, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/reports6010004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free