End-member modelling of isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) acquisition curves: A novel approach to diagnose remagnetization

Abstract

To identify remagnetization is essential for palaeomagnetic studies and their geodynamic implications. The traditional approach is often based on directional analysis of palaeomagnetic data and field tests, which may be inconclusive if the apparent polar wander path (APWP) is poorly constrained or if the remagnetization predates folding. In several cases, rock magnetic work, particularly, the measurement of hysteresis loops allows identification of the so-called 'remagnetized' and 'non-remagnetized' trends. However, for weakly magnetic samples, this approach can be equivocal. Here, to improve the diagnosis of remagnetization, we investigated 192 isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) acquisition curves (up to 700 mT) of remagnetized and non-remagnetized limestones from the Organyà Basin, northern Spain. Also, 96 IRM acquisition curves from non-remagnetized marls were studied as a cross-check for the non-remagnetized limestones. A non-parametric end-member modelling approach is used to analyse the IRM acquisition curve data sets. First, remagnetized and non-remagnetized groups were treated separately. Two or three end-members were found to adequately describe the data variability: one end-member represents the high-coercivity contribution, whereas the low-coercivity part can be described by either one end-member or two reasonably similar end-members. In the remagnetized limestones, the low-coercivity end-members tend to saturate at higher field values than in the non-remagnetized limestones. When the entire data set was processed together, a three-end-member model was judged optimal. This model consists of a high-coercivity end-member, a low-coercivity end-member that saturates at ∼300-400 mT and a low-coercivity end-member that approximately saturates at 700 mT. Higher contributions of the latter end-member appear to occur dominantly in the remagnetized limestones, whereas the reverse is true for the non-remagnetized limestones, so they plot in clearly distinguishable areas. Meanwhile, the IRM curves from non-remagnetized marls show a behaviour similar to that of the non-remagnetized end-member in the limestones. Therefore, this new approach can be a very useful tool to diagnose remagnetization in weakly magnetic limestones and marls. We recommend applying it to other areas of potentially remagnetized low-intensity sediments. © Journal compilation © 2009 RAS.