Using a dependently-typed language for expressing ontologies

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the last decade the wide spread language for expressing ontologies relies on Description Logics (DLs). However, most of the versions syntactically anchor their modeling primitives on classical logic and require additional theories (i.e., first-order logic, ...) for simultaneously supporting (i) the introduction of constant values (e.g., for individuals) (ii) the limitation of expressiveness for decidability and (iii) the introduction of variables for reasoning with rules. In this paper we show that the introduction of a type theoretical formalism that relies both on a constructive logic and on a typed lambda calculus is able to go beyond these aspects in a single theory. In particular we will show that a number of logical choices (constructive logic, predicative universes for data types, impredicative universe for logic, ...) about the theory will lead to an highly expressive theory which allows for the production of conceptually clean and semantically unambiguous ontologies. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dapoigny, R., & Barlatier, P. (2011). Using a dependently-typed language for expressing ontologies. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7091 LNAI, pp. 257–268). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25975-3_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free