Comparison of infectious complications between incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.

121Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The impact of dialysis modality on infection, especially early in the course of dialysis, has not been well studied. This study compared infection between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) from the start of dialysis and evaluated factors that have an impact on infection risk. In this observational cohort study, all incident dialysis patients (n = 181; HD 119 and PD 62) at a single center from 1999 to 2005 had data collected prospectively beginning day 1 of dialysis. Excluded were those with any previous ESRD therapy. Infection rates were evaluated using multivariate Poisson regression. Overall infection rates were similar (HD 0.77 versus PD 0.86/yr; P = 0.24). Only HD patients had bacteremia (0.16/yr), and only PD patients had peritonitis (0.24/yr). Bacteremia that occurred < 0.004). HD catheters, used in 67% of patients who started HD, were associated with a strikingly increased rate of bacteremia. Peritonitis

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aslam, N., Bernardini, J., Fried, L., Burr, R., & Piraino, B. (2006). Comparison of infectious complications between incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 1(6), 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01230406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free