The efficacy and safety of the WATCHMAN device in LAA occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation contraindicated to oral anticoagulation: A focused review

18Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The standard treatment for stroke risk patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the use of oral anticoagulants (OACs). However, a substantial number of patients have relative or absolute contraindications to OACs due to concerns of major bleeding risk and other adverse effects while using oral anticoagulation therapy. Recently, occurrences of exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with contraindication to anticoagulation therapy are widely expanding worldwide, causing major contentious discussions. The LAA is the commonest place of thrombus formation; therefore, the concept of LAA occlusion in reducing stroke and other embolic events in NVAF patients is very important. The current understanding of the available evidence on efficacy and safety of LAA closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device in patients contraindicated to OACs is the major aim of this focused review. After reviewing a significant body of literature, a world experience with no randomized trials, it is suggested that Watchman device implantation is effective and safe in high-risk patients with NVAF contraindicated to OACs therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Majule, D. N., Jing, C., Rutahoile, W. M., & Shonyela, F. S. (2018). The efficacy and safety of the WATCHMAN device in LAA occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation contraindicated to oral anticoagulation: A focused review. Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Japanese Association for Coronary Artery Surgery. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.ra.18-00014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free