Tracheostomy: The Dynamics of Indications in an Old Procedure

  • DD K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Securing a surgical airway remains one of the fundamental components of critical care medicine as an obstructed airway for more than three minutes is not compatible with life. Purpose: Critical appraisal of the dynamics of the indications for tracheostomy in a developing country. Study design: Retrospective Methods: Analyzed tracheostomy patients’ data over a 3-year period. Results: We studied 41 tracheostomy cases of the 235 Ear Nose Throat operations, constituting 17.4%. The M:F = 2.2:1, mean age = 33.2 yrs ± 20.3. The relief of upper airway obstruction (n = 30, 73.2%) was the main indication with tumors accounting for 50% (n = 15, 36.6%). Ventilatory support was the next main indication (n = 9, 22.0%). Of this, 4 (9.8%), representing 1.6% of the intubated who developed laryngotracheal stenosis. Emerging indications included Cut throat and infective causes that had a tie (n = 4, 9.8%). Twentynine (70.7%) were successfully decannulated. The study recorded 12.2% complications while perioperative mortality was 4.9%. Conclusion: Indications for elective tracheostomy is well established, however, an algorithm describing the indications and timing for a surgical airway in emergency cannot be drawn due to the multiplicity of variables and the inapplicability in the context of life-threatening critical emergency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DD, K. (2016). Tracheostomy: The Dynamics of Indications in an Old Procedure. Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4193.1510016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free