Errata for “Dynamic Properties of Chemically Stabilized Sulfate Rich Clay”

  • Hoyos L
  • Puppala A
  • Chainuwat P
0Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A series of resonant column tests was conducted on chemically stabilized specimens of sulfate-rich expansive clay from southeast Arlington, Tex. Specimens were tested for different stabilizer types, stabilizer dosages, compaction moisture contents, and confining pressures. Three chemical stabilization methods were used: sulfate resistant type V cement, low calcium class F fly ash, and lime mixed with polypropylene fibers. Results in the small-shear strain amplitude range (0.0001%) were analyzed to assess the influence of compaction moisture content and confining pressure on the linear shear modulus G max and material damping D min of stabilized soil. Tests were also conducted at small-to mid-shear strain amplitude levels 0.0001-0.01% to assess the threshold strain limit th for each treatment method, and to study the effects of torsional shearing on the rate of degradation of normalized modulus G/G max of treated soil. A 10%-by-weight dosage of sulfate resistant type V cement was found to give the highest modulus and lowest damping when compacted at 95% of maximum dry unit weight d-max on the wet side of Proctor optimum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoyos, L. R., Puppala, A. J., & Chainuwat, P. (2004). Errata for “Dynamic Properties of Chemically Stabilized Sulfate Rich Clay.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(6), 661–661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:6(661)

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free