Abstract
As anthropology reckons with its past, present, and future, anthropologists increasingly seek to challenge inequities within the discipline and academia more broadly. Anthropology, regardless of subdiscipline, is a social endeavor. Yet research often remains an isolating (though not necessarily solitary) process, even within research teams and in coauthorship contexts. Here, we focus on peer-reviewed publication as the principal manifestation of knowledge production and propose a method for challenging division, hierarchy, power differentials, and adherence to tradition: writing in community. Writing in community is a collaborative form of writing that centers care, abundance, joy, and personal satisfaction over the individuality currently rewarded by the academy. This process engenders consensus, circumvents normative hierarchical research and writing, and promotes relationship building. Here, we experiment by inviting reviewers and editors into our community to collectively contribute to the writing process and reflect on that experience together. Ultimately, we challenge norms for scholarship, (co)authorship, and ways of knowing to offer a more equitable praxis of knowledge production. We propose that writing in community can help anthropologists enact values of multivocality and research transparency.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rivera Prince, J. A., Blackwood, E. M., Landrum, M., Milton, E. B. P., Rodgers, E. L., Barnes, M., … Sandweiss, D. H. (2025). Writing in community: Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production. American Anthropologist, 127(2), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.28070
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.